For my exegesis paper for my prophetic literature class, I am exegeting Isaiah 2.6-22. On the face of it, it appears to be a condemnation of, among other things, the manufacture and worship of idols, and the humbling of all things on a 'day of the Lord'. It follows the more famous passage (vv. 2-5), mirrored in Micah, about the pre-eminence of Zion and how all nations will stream to learn instruction...
Currently stands at just over 4,000 words, sans introduction and conclusion, which I need to see Ann about before whacking those in. But, it's DONE! The draft is DONE! Have been working on it solid for...the additional paragraph I added, but I've realised that I need to expand my appendix, now that it's going to be a chapter at the back, and not footnotes. It's almost done. Can anybody say "elated?
...between the literal and allegorical meanings of Scripture, "The letter indicates the facts; what you have to believe is indicated by allegory, that is to say, by Christological and pneumatological exegesis." The second, and for me even more compelling point, is where he speaks of the nature of human freedom. "Absence of obligation and arbitrariness do not signify freedom, but its destruction." Anyway...
Seeing as my ambitions to become a film director are really a "backup plan"--that is to say, a "pipe dream"--to becoming something more plausible/practical, I've decided to write a critical paper on this...my new-found reconciliation with religion may/may-not suggest. † The relationship between Michelle and her girlfriend, Liz, in Tea's book pretty much mirror's the relationship between Tracy and Evie
...an personal investment from gamers and how is that illustrated by reactions to changes and new versions? This question will be answered by both a creative nonfiction piece and the theoretical exegesis in different ways. Creative Production The ideas surrounding player investment, both from the research theory and from interviews with players, will be used to construct...
... · Discover player reactions to announced v4 and observe game play to cross reference. · Address player investment in relation to corresponding theory through exegesis. · Present ideas surrounding player investment through a piece of creative nonfiction that will allow theory to be accessed by a general reading audience. Background...
Ok, still here. Website hasn't been updated since last August, but we're still here. Oi. Nothing too much exciting yet, just some more exegesis wank. Yes I do totally write things that don't read like bad Evanescence songfics. Some of them read like bad Linkin Park songfics. Also, this will likely be the future dumping ground of the K&P rewrites, so you can look forward to ignoring that as well...
...The Novum Testamentum Graece (ed. Souter) has inserted punctuation favouring the second option; its text of Jn. 7.37-38 reads: 0Ean tiv diya, erxesqw prov me kai\pinetw. o(pisteuwn eiv eme, kaqwv eipen h( grafh/ ... [3] The variants are noted on, e.g. , the handout ‘Text-Critical Problems for Exegesis Papers on John’, by Dan Smith.
Here is the structural outline and exegetical assessment of John 7.37-44, the passage I have chosen to exegete for my New Testament Biblical studies class. A. Jesus’ Proclamation... for the general sense, see Prov 18.4; Isa 44.3; 58.11’: The New Oxford Annotated Bible (NRSV), p. 161 [NT], note for vv. 38-39. ǂ Indicates a textual problem. See the appendix.
